Safe Places In Everett, WA To Take A Newborn

March 26, 2016

Everett, Police Blotter

take a newborn

Everett Police begin their investigation after a baby was found in a trash compactor Friday night.

There are better places in Everett, Washington to take a newborn without fear of arrest or identification than a trash dumpster.

Sadly Everett Police removed a newborn baby boy from a trash compactor at the Mirabella apartments Friday night.

The baby is expected to survive.

While many are outraged, we thought it was appropriate to go over the law for those who may not be aware.

The short answer for those in Everett is any hospital emergency room.

Providence Regional Medical Center 1700 13th St · (425) 261-2000

Swedish Medical Center: Mill Creek Campus 13020 Meridian Ave S · (425) 357-3900

Any Everett Fire Station when crews are present.

List of Everett Fire Stations

Here are the laws in Washington State that outline the “Safe Haven” protections for dealing with newborns…

RCW 13.34.360

Transfer of newborn to qualified person—Criminal liability—Notification to child protective services—Definitions.

(1) For purposes of this section:
(a) “Appropriate location” means (i) the emergency department of a hospital licensed under chapter 70.41 RCW during the hours the hospital is in operation; (ii) a fire station during its hours of operation and while fire personnel are present; or (iii) a federally designated rural health clinic during its hours of operation.
(b) “Newborn” means a live human being who is less than seventy-two hours old.
(c) “Qualified person” means (i) any person that the parent transferring the newborn reasonably believes is a bona fide employee, volunteer, or medical staff member of the hospital or federally designated rural health clinic and who represents to the parent transferring the newborn that he or she can and will summon appropriate resources to meet the newborn’s immediate needs; or (ii) a firefighter, volunteer, or emergency medical technician at a fire station who represents to the parent transferring the newborn that he or she can and will summon appropriate resources to meet the newborn’s immediate needs.
(2) A parent of a newborn who transfers the newborn to a qualified person at an appropriate location is not subject to criminal liability under RCW9A.42.060, 9A.42.070, 9A.42.080, 26.20.030, or 26.20.035.
(3)(a) The qualified person at an appropriate location shall not require the parent transferring the newborn to provide any identifying information in order to transfer the newborn.
(b) The qualified person at an appropriate location shall attempt to protect the anonymity of the parent who transfers the newborn, while providing an opportunity for the parent to anonymously give the qualified person such information as the parent knows about the family medical history of the parents and the newborn. The qualified person at an appropriate location shall provide referral information about adoption options, counseling, appropriate medical and emotional aftercare services, domestic violence, and legal rights to the parent seeking to transfer the newborn.
(c) If a parent of a newborn transfers the newborn to a qualified person at an appropriate location pursuant to this section, the qualified person shall cause child protective services to be notified within twenty-four hours after receipt of such a newborn. Child protective services shall assume custody of the newborn within twenty-four hours after receipt of notification.
(d) A federally designated rural health clinic is not required to provide ongoing medical care of a transferred newborn beyond that already required by law and may transfer the newborn to a hospital licensed under chapter 70.41 RCW. The federally designated rural health clinic shall notify child protective services of the transfer of the newborn to the hospital.
(e) A hospital, federally designated rural health clinic, or fire station, its employees, volunteers, and medical staff are immune from any criminal or civil liability for accepting or receiving a newborn under this section.
(4)(a) Beginning July 1, 2011, an appropriate location shall post a sign indicating that the location is an appropriate place for the safe and legal transfer of a newborn.
(b) To cover the costs of acquiring and placing signs, appropriate locations may accept nonpublic funds and donations.
[2009 c 290 § 1; 2002 c 331 § 2.]
Intent—2002 c 331: “The legislature intends to increase the likelihood that pregnant women will obtain adequate prenatal care and will provide their newborns with adequate health care during the first few days of their lives. The legislature recognizes that prenatal and postdelivery health care for newborns and their mothers is especially critical to their survival and well-being. The legislature does not intend to encourage the abandonment of newborn children nor to change existing law relating to notification to parents under chapter 13.34 RCW, but rather to assure that abandonment does not occur and that all newborns have an opportunity for adequate health care and a stable home life.” [2002 c 331 § 1.]
Effective date—2002 c 331: “Sections 1 through 7 of this act are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and take effect immediately [April 3, 2002].” [2002 c 331 § 9.]

Editor’s Note: There are many places to take a newborn in Everett, WA. Please share this information as you see fit.

About myeverettnews

My Everett News is a hyperlocal news website featuring breaking news and events in Everett, WA. We also cover City of Everett information and items of interest to those who live and work in Everett. It's written by Leland Dart a former Snohomish County based radio reporter born and raised in Everett.

View all posts by myeverettnews

2 Responses to “Safe Places In Everett, WA To Take A Newborn”

  1. Bingo Says:

    I had heard the cops almost gave up and it took determination of the lady to save the baby. What’s up with that EPD?

  2. Baby Safe Haven New England Says:

    Sadly there will be 100 deadly newborn abandonments across the country in any 18 month period you choose, from recent start date to 18 months out.
    That’s 100 dead newborns!
    What is the response of the major safe haven awareness campaigns across the country? You’re seeing exactly what they do in this article. The same exact response to deadly newborn abandonments took place just weeks ago in Illinois. Same in Indiana, New Jersey, Michigan, South Carolina, and most of those states these where deadly abandonments happened multiple times in the last six to twelve months. California has 5 or more abandonments per year. They have multiple funerals, and a dedication of a park to the safe haven children by a 70 year old county supervisor.
    Where isn’t this endless set of senseless tragedies taking place? Massachusetts. We’ve had only one deadly newborn abandonment in the last 9 years! 4 out of the last 5 calendar years have had zero newborn abandonments!
    What is Massachusetts doing to stop 90% of newborn abandonments? That’s right we’ve stopped 90% of newborn abandonments!!
    We use standard demographic marketing of our Baby Safe Haven law!! It’s teen and 20 year olds that use the laws, and they are the ONLY ones you see out in the media promoting Baby Safe Haven in Massachusetts!
    NEVER do you see a 50+ year old official using a shaming message against Generation Y or Z. It’s peers helping peers in crisis. AND IT WORKS!!
    We NEVER use safely surrendered babies or children to mock teens who are in crisis and need to make tough decisions.
    All the states who use the old advocates, old so-called “experts,” old officials and old politicians to exclusively promote their laws have the HIGHEST numbers of newborn abandonments!
    And every single one of those states does this exact same strategy again and again when another deadly newborn abandonment takes place. It’s insane!
    They all know that Massachusetts has stopped 90% of these tragedies, but they refuse to follow a program that puts teens and 20 somethings out in front of the press every single time. The old officials, and so-called experts, see their face time as more important over the death of the next newborn. And there will be another deadly newborn abandonment again, sometimes in just weeks, because they can’t communicate with Gen Y & Z. It’s insane!!
    Introducing just a few of the young people who will inform their peers across the country following our Massachusetts model.

    The originator of the MA campaign with over 100 media coverages for Baby Safe Haven: & & & &

    A 15 year old in Massachusetts:

    23 year old from Indiana on YouNow social media platform promoting Baby Safe Haven:

    Here’s 16 year old in Wichita, KS, on radio, TV, and front page newspaper coverage: & &

    This 20 year old is the only bilingual spokesperson/advocate for any Baby Safe Haven law in the US. In Chicagoland en Espanol: &

    18 year old in Danbury, CT, on radio and another front page newspaper story and in a recent tragedy: & And: &

    16 year old in Knoxville, Tennessee:

    In Los Angeles, SOTs for TV news use: 1 – 2 –